2017考研英语：需精读的4篇真题阅读

2016-08-18 14:44:23来源：网络

【点睛】3h掌握考研全科备考方案名师辅助择校及考研备考 22考研复试调剂攻略&23考研上岸指南

【考试入门】考研阅读个性化精准提分攻略 2h掌握考研数学基础考点
【热点】 2022考研查分入口——晒分得奖学金

　　考研英语真题一定要好好研究，对于阅读这个重头戏，要拿高分，真题更是要研究透了，新东方在线名师唐迟老师建议精读2010年text1(中心的提出;长难句);2010text4(文章结构分析，结合第3题);2011text4(作者态度标新立异，结合2题3题);2012年text3(如何处理生僻概念)。其中规律在近5年里考得非常凶猛，务必多总结。下面小编把这几篇调出来整理下，方便大家精读。

　　2010年英语一真题Text 1

　　Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.

　　It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.

　　We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.’”

　　Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England’s foremost classical-music critics, a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967, the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.

　　Is there any chance that Cardus’s criticism will enjoy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly upholstered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.

　　21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that

　　[A] arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.

　　[B] English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.

　　[C] high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.

　　[D] young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.

　　22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War II were characterized by

　　[A] free themes. [B] casual style. [C] elaborate layout. [D] radical viewpoints.

　　23. Which of the following would Shaw and Newman most probably agree on?

　　[A] It is writers' duty to fulfill journalistic goals

　　[B] It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.

　　[C] Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.

　　[D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.